Commercial Landlords and Tenants with Covid-19 Rent Arrears – NEW Code of Practice

What is changing?

Commercial tenants are currently protected from eviction until 25 March 2022, to provide businesses with breathing space and help protect jobs when certain industries had to close in full or in part during the pandemic. A voluntary code for commercial landlords and tenants was introduced in June 2020, encouraging landlords and tenants to negotiate and settle rent arrears where possible.

This has now been replaced by a new voluntary Code of Practice (“the Code”), which will establish a legally binding arbitration process for commercial landlords and tenants who have not already reached agreement on existing rent arrears. The Code sets out that, in the first instance, tenants unable to pay in full should negotiate with their landlord in the expectation that the landlord waives some or all rent arrears where they are able to do so and/or agrees a payment plan, limited to 2 years.

When does the Code apply?

The Code applies to all commercial leases held by business tenants that have built up rent arrears (including service charges and insurance) due to an inability to pay, caused by being forced to close or cease trading as a result of the pandemic. This includes the hospitality, retail, leisure and manufacturing sectors. The arrears must have accrued during a ring-fenced period, being from 21 March 2020, when business closures first came into force, to the date when specific restrictions were last removed for that relevant business sector (“Ring Fenced Debts”).

The business tenants must have a “viable” business. There is no set definition of viability and the parties are asked to consider whether the business tenant, aside from the Ring Fenced Debts, has or will in the foreseeable future have, the means and ability to meet its obligations and to continue trading.  If a tenant business has not been able to pay any rent since Covid restrictions were lifted this may be evidence that the tenant business is not viable.

The Negotiation Process – what you need to show

The Code promotes a settlement that preserves – in so far as possible – the tenant business and the jobs that it supports, without undermining the solvency of the landlord. Tenants will need to show landlords sufficient evidence to substantiate their need for assistance with rent.  Landlords should also make clear to the tenants the impact of late or non-payment of rent on their own circumstances.

Evidence will vary depending on the specific circumstances but could include, existing and anticipated credit/debit balance, business performance since March 2020, overdue invoices or tax demands, exceeding overdraft limits, creditor demands, loss of important contracts, insolvency of a major customer.  When considering what is affordable for either party, this should not include restructuring, borrowing, or the taking on of further debts.

Binding Arbitration – if there is no settlement

Where the parties are unable to reach a settlement, The Commercial Rents (Coronavirus) Bill (“the Bill”) introduces a binding arbitration process.

  • Step 1 A letter of notification: the landlord or tenant must notify the other party of their intention to pursue binding arbitration. At this point the party will be expected to submit a proposal for settlement of Ring Fenced Debts, supported by any appropriate evidence of affordability.
  • Step 2 The other party may respond and can either accept the proposal made or submit a counterproposal.
  • Step 3 An application by either the landlord or the tenant together with a fee: the application must include the notification sent during the pre-application stage, their proposal for resolution and relevant supporting evidence.
  • Step 4 The other party will then have 14 days to submit their own proposal, together with any supporting evidence. Following that, the parties will have the opportunity to submit revised proposals for what the arbitrator’s award should be.
  • Step 5 Both the landlord and tenant will then be given the choice of a public hearing or, if neither party asks for a hearing, the arbitrator will consider the matter based on the documentation provided.
  • Step 6 The arbitrator will seek to conduct a hearing no more than 14 days from the receipt of a request for one. The arbitrator will decide how to conduct the hearing, which should not last more than six hours.
  • Step 7 The arbitrator will consider their decision based on the written evidence and any hearing and notify parties, within 14 days of a hearing, of the award made. The arbitrator’s award will be legally binding.
Timeframe and Fees

Parties will be given 6 months from the date the Bill comes into force to apply for the arbitration process.  It is currently anticipated that the Bill will be passed by 25 March 2022 (being the date upon which the current protection for commercial tenants expires).   The fees payable for arbitration will be payable in advance and are yet to be decided. The fees are expected to be variable; with a sliding scale, relative to the size of the rental arrears owed, used to determine a fee cap and ensure it is proportionate for each case.

Prevention of other Enforcement Action

It is important to note that the Bill will prevent other remedies from being exercised in relation to the Ring Fenced Debts, until either a settlement has been reached or the 6 month timeframe for applying to the arbitration system has passed.

Landlords will not be able to issue debt proceedings nor enforce any judgments obtained in relation to ring-fenced debts between 10 November 2021 and the end of the 6-month window for arbitration.  Landlord’s will also not be able to take any action through the Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery procedure nor commence any insolvency processes.

 PRACTICAL POINTS – what landlords and tenants need to consider
  • Landlords will want to consider carefully the long-term impact of tenant businesses failing and leaving their property empty and liable to business rates.
  • Tenants should be proactive in approaching their landlord and providing sufficient information about the impact that the pandemic has had on their business.
  • Transparency is important for both parties as agreements struck on the basis of false or misleading information are unlikely to be enforceable.
  • Landlords should not seek historic financial information or personal guarantees from tenants where none were provided when the lease commenced. The lease remains an ongoing contract between the parties and should only be varied to reflect the impact of the pandemic upon both parties.
  • Agreements made conditional upon future rent payments or payments towards arrears of rent being honoured by tenants should be flexible enough to accommodate future trading restrictions that the Government might have to impose to manage the pandemic. Future commitments might best be framed by reference to the number of days a business is able to trade normally, such after trading for X days the tenant will pay £y.

For further questions please contact Michael Shapiro directly on: [email protected] or 0207 822 2246, or  Mark Richardson directly on [email protected] or 0207 822 2240.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

 

Family Investment Companies – Tax & Succession Planning

Family Investment Companies (FIC) remain a useful tax and succession planning tool as clients seek alternatives or complementary ways of structuring their estates for tax optimisation and planning for the next generation.
Below is a brief synopsis of what a FIC is and how it works:

GSC_FamilyGuideance_LO_RES

 

For further question in relation to  Private Client Partner Amanda Chapman on [email protected] or 020 7822 2254.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

  

Autumn 2021 Budget: Highlights

The Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, delivered the Autumn 2021 Budget on 27 October 2021. Many anticipated for there to be a major overhaul of taxes, including Capital Gains Tax and Inheritance Tax in order to recover Government spending during the Covid-19 crisis, i.e., the cost of the Furlough Scheme. However, in fact, the Chancellor introduced very little changes to the tax system.

The most important announcements for the private client world are listed below.

Lifetime Planning
  •  The deadline for reporting and paying any capital gains tax (CGT) on a sale of residential property in the United Kingdom has been extended from 30 days to 60 days after the completion date. The time limit applies to both UK residents and non-UK residents disposing of property in the United Kingdom.
  • The income tax rates applicable to dividend income will rise by 1.25%. The dividend ordinary rate and the dividend upper rate will rise to 8.75% and 33.75% respectively. The dividend additional rate and the dividend trust rate will rise to 39.35%.
  • From 1 April 2022, the annual chargeable amounts for the annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED) will increase by 3.1%.
Real Estate
  •  The Government will introduce a new Residential Property Developer Tax (RPDT) on residential property development profits of a residential property developer derived from UK residential property development. This will take effect from 1 April 2022 for relevant profits arising on or after this date.
  • A new tax regime for Qualifying Asset Holding Companies (QAHCs) will come into effect from 1 April 2022. A QAHC is exempt from UK tax on gains on disposals of specific shares and overseas property as well as profits of an overseas property business that are subject to tax in an overseas jurisdiction. A number of other measures designed to simplify the taxation of financing arrangements for QAHCs will also be introduced to ease the tax and administrative burden.
Charities
  • The Government has no intention of removing any of the existing business rates reliefs, including the mandatory and discretionary charity reliefs.
  • The Government will introduce a new temporary business rates relief for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure properties for 2022-2023. Charities with eligible properties (such as charity shops) will benefit from a 50% relief. There will be a cap of £110,000 per business.
Companies
  •  The Government has published a Consultation containing proposals for enabling the re-domiciliation of a company’s corporate seat to the UK. It seeks views on the introduction of a UK re-domiciliation regime.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact James Cohen directly on [email protected] or 0207 822 2257.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved.  GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

 

Stamp Duty Tax increase in the past 25 years

The latest property market analysis that has been conducted by Benham and Reeves, a London estate agent, has revealed that that the average SDLT bill for the average homebuyer across the United Kingdom over the last 25 years has increased by 490%.

The increase is mainly due to the property boom and with the stamp duty holiday having ended on 30 September 2021, the cost of stamp duty has now never been higher. Further the legislation surrounding SDLT over the last few years has meant that the it has never been more complicated to calculate the rate of tax. For example, the introduction of surcharges for non-residents, first time buyer discounts and second-home buyer surcharge.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact James Cohen directly on [email protected] or 0207 822 2257.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved.  GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

https://bit.ly/3naao8W

Michael Shapiro features in The Guardian

Residential and commercial evictions – where are we now? That’s the question asked by The Guardian readers and answered by Michael Shapiro, who heads GSC’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution.

On 31 May 2021 the restrictions on evicting residential tenants came to an end. ‘Eviction dates are now being listed and we can expect a spate of people being evicted from their homes and pressure being put on the local authorities to rehouse them’, says Michael.

‘The restrictions on possession and forfeiture of commercial leases for non-payment of rent, and seizing a tenants goods during the Covid 19 period was due to expire on 30 June 2021 but this has now been extended until 25 March 2022. This will give tenants more time to resolve their arrears with their landlords, if they can.’

‘Commercial landlords and tenants ought to work together to avoid properties becoming empty. Landlords clearly want to have tenants in occupation paying the ongoing rent and remaining liable for all outgoings, and tenants want to stay in business and earn an income.’

The article can be accessed here

If you have been affected by the new change in law, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Shapiro directly on: [email protected] or 0207 822 2246.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

 

 

 

Execution of a warrant of possession coming on 6th July

Today Richard Curtin who heads GSC’s Insolvency & Restructuring department, received notification from the court of the execution of a warrant of possession on 6 July.

This shows that the Courts are now enforcing warrants of possession for residential premises and sooner than many would have expected.

As to commercial premises, the moratorium on forfeiture & winding up petitions is due to end at the end of this month.

If not extended by the Government then Richard expects to see plenty of activity on the part of landlords, solicitors, insolvency practitioners and the Courts.

If you have any questions or concerns about your business, contact Richard Curtin directly on [email protected] or 020 7822 2222.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

 

Copy Caterpillar – The M&S and Aldi cake wars

It is a case that is currently making headlines in the UK and dominating discussion over a cup of tea and slice of caterpillar cake.

M&S have brought a legal case against Aldi in respect of their sale of a Cuthbert the Caterpillar cake. That cake is noticeably similar to the well known and popular Colin the Caterpillar cake which has been so successful for M&S since it was first launched many years ago.  While other retailers have marketed similar cakes, such as Waitrose’s Cecil the Caterpillar, it appears that it is the low price of Aldi’s cake that has prompted the legal action by M&S.

The case brought by M&S is likely to have two separate lines of attack.

Trade Mark Infringement

Firstly, M&S are likely to allege that the Cuthbert the Caterpillar cake infringes their trade marks of the names ‘Colin the Caterpillar’ and ‘Connie the Caterpillar’ and the packaging of the Colin the Caterpillar cake.

M&S will argue that in each case the similarities in the packaging or the name are likely to lead to confusion in the market place and cause consumers to believe that the Aldi cake is associated or connected with or from the same supplier as the M&S versions.

M&S will also argue that as a result of the public awareness of the Colin the Caterpillar product, Aldi’s use of similar names and packaging take unfair advantage of the enhanced reputation which those marks may have acquired.

Passing off

M&S case also may argue that Aldi are passing off their Cuthbert cake as a Colin cake (or coming from the same source). Similar to the trade mark arguments on unfair advantage, M&S will rely on the significant reputation and consumer awareness of the Colin cake to allege that Aldi have misrepresented that their Cuthbert cake is associated with or connected to the Colin version.

M&S’s case on passing off may be stronger, as it will not be limited to the elements covered by the separate trade marks, but could include any and all similarity including the overall shape and decoration of the cake. However, they will face the task and cost of providing evidence of the reputation in those elements alone as opposed to the name and other packaging.

Aldi is well known for sailing close to the wind with its packaging, with recent spats with Brewdog and others making the news. They may seek to argue that their customers are aware of this practice and won’t be confused as to the origin of the Cuthbert cake.

It will be interesting to see how the case develops. It has already garnered a lot of media attention (which is unlikely to disadvantage either party) but any finding of infringement against Aldi could lead to an increase in challenges and cases being brought against Aldi by other food manufacturers.

For further questions please do not hesitate to contact Ross Waldram directly on [email protected] or 0207 822 2236.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved. GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.

 

專業法律團隊 – 為您籌劃移居英國、投資每一步

香港 BN(O) 簽證政策

英國內政部大臣宣佈英國將為來自香港的英國國民(海外)建立一條自訂移民路線。這項新的香港 BN(O) 簽證政策非常慷慨,沒有施加技能測試或最低收入要求、經濟需求測試或人數上限,並且將允許 BN(O) 簽證持有人在英國居住、工作或學習,提供了一條定居而後獲得公民身份的途徑。

該簽證的有效期最長為 5 年,簽證持有人在英國居住5 年後,只要沒有犯罪行為,在經濟上自給自足,並且遵守簽證條款,便可以申請定居身份;並可以在繼續逗留一年後申請英國國籍。

私人客戶 移民前規劃

如果您正考慮持新的香港 BN(O) 簽證來英國,您務必要瞭解在抵達英國之前、之時和之後適用的個人稅項和法律含義。

我們的私人客戶團隊擅長提供全套私人客戶服務(包括稅收籌劃),當結合我們公司完善的公司和財產部門時,我們能夠為您提供全面的、度身訂造的建議,以確保您有最佳的策略來遷居英國。我們的建議可涵蓋以下範疇:

  • 如何最合理地在英國置業
  • 建立境內和境外信託以保全財富
  • 繼任計劃,以協助確保以最有效的方式處理各個轄區的資產
  • 針對所得稅和資本利得稅的居留和匯款計劃
  • 如何安排在英國的投資
  • 多司法管轄區遺囑和授權書
在英國的房地產投資 商業或住宅

對於世界各地的房地產投資者而言,英國一直以來都是最理想的目的地。無論您是想購買英國房地產自用還是投資,我們的房地產律師都能為您提供幫助。我們是一家採用現代和商業方法來遵守財產法但保留傳統價值的公司。我們確保收費人始終在最適當的層面,以最經濟高效率的方式處理您的事務,並具備適當的資歷來確保您獲得應得的服務。

  • 商業地產

我們的客戶包括領先的房地產所有者、機構和私人投資者、開發商和建築商、銀行和其他金融機構、酒店經營者、私人業主、企業家、加盟商、具有綜合體職業租約的藍籌租戶、休閒和醫療保健物業所有者、初創企業、在英國或海外的老牌企業租戶和高淨值人士。

            他們每個人都重視我們在各種房地產交易領域的卓著市場聲譽和經驗。

我們為所有層面的財產事務提供建議,並在過去十年中為一些最引人注目的、最前沿的房東和租戶案件提供法律服務,服務案例包括具有開創性的 Daejan Investments Limited Benson 及其他人員的案件裁決,這可能是近年來法院審理的最重要房東和租戶案件,EMI Group Ltd O & H Q1 Ltd

和 GSC 的房地產團隊討論:

住宅物業

GSC 的住宅物業律師處理整個英格蘭和威爾斯的價值物業轉讓,包括皇室物業和其他歷史遺產。我們瞭解處理此類財產時可能會遇到的複雜問題,並且我們知道,只有以與您的稅務、家庭和私人財富管理無縫配合的方式來管理產權轉讓,才能最好地滿足您的最大利益。

這就是從未單獨與 GSC 進行住宅轉售的原因。與我們聯絡,您會發現您的財產律師與我們的私人客戶團隊合作,能夠確保您的所有利益都得到認真考慮和保護。

我們的財產律師可以在住宅物業法的所有方面提供協助,包括處置或獲得永久業權和租賃權、延期租賃、權利取得和優先購買權。

Ms Carey Xu

Carey Xu,律師

GSC Solicitors LLP

電話:+44(020) 7822 2231

電子郵件:[email protected]

網址:www.gscsolicitors.com

Carey 是私人財富團隊的律師。

她在和高淨值人士打交道方面有著豐富的經驗,涉及複雜的移民和財富規劃事務。她還為初創企業和公司業務提供法律服務,處理商業移民和聘僱問題。Carey 在迄今為止的所有移民申請中的成功率為100%。

她還是GSC大中華地區負責人,負責接待講中文的客戶,工作涉及移民、私人客戶、公司商業、財產和知識財產權等方面。她能操流利中文和英語。

如果您和/或您的企業打算遷入英國,請確保第一個聯絡 Carey。Carey期待盡心為您一一籌劃安排。

 

Budget 2021: Highlights

On 3 March 2021 Rishi Sunak, Chancellor of the Exchequer, delivered the Spring Budget setting out his plans as the United Kingdom starts to ease the lockdown and revealing the goals that he is looking to achieve after the pandemic.

Presenting the government’s spending plans for the year ahead, the Chancellor announced the new measures with the intention of helping businesses and jobs through these difficult times.

The measures are aimed at supporting the country’s long-term economic recovery as well as rebalancing the public finances with the help of tax rising.

Below is a summary of the key announcements for the private client world.

Property
  • The stamp duty holiday has been extended and will now end on 30 June instead of 31 March.
  • The nil rate band will be £250,000 until the end of September. The government will return to the usual level of £125,000 from 1 October.
Tax
  •  The income personal allowance will increase to £12,570 from £12,500 for the 2021/22 tax year. The basic rate threshold will increase to £37,700 from £37,500.
  • The income tax personal allowance and higher rate threshold are then to be frozen until April 2026.
  • The starting rate limit for savings will remain at £5,000 for the 2021/22 tax year. This band of savings income is subject to the 0% starting rate.
  • The Capital Gains Tax (CGT) annual exemption will remain at £12,300 for individuals and personal representatives until April 2026.
  • The lifetime allowance on pension contributions has been frozen at its current 2020/21 level of £1,073,100.
  • The annual ISA adult subscription limit will remain at £20,000, and the annual subscription limit for Junior ISAs will remain at £9,000.
 Charities
  •  The government will continue supporting the country’s social enterprises that are looking for growth investment by extending the SITR scheme to 6 April 2023.
  •  The government will provide armed forces charities with up to £475,000 in the 2021/22 tax year to support the development of a digital and data strategy.
  • The Armed Forces Covenant Fund Trust will receive additional £10 million in 2021/22 tax year for charitable projects and initiatives that support veterans with mental health needs across the country.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact James Cohen directly on [email protected] or 0207 822 2257.

© 2021 GSC Solicitors LLP. All rights reserved.  GSC grants permission for the browsing of this material and for the printing of one copy per person for personal reference. GSC’s written permission must be obtained for any other use of this material. This publication has been prepared only as a guide to provide readers with general information on recent legal developments. It is not formal legal advice and should not be relied on for any purpose. You should not act or refrain from acting based on the information contained in this document without obtaining specific formal advice from suitably qualified advisors.