Apart from handling ordinary claims for negligence, we at GSC are often consulted regarding alleged failures by professionals, such as solicitors, accountants, surveyors and architects. Usually any such claim involves the professional’s insurers who appoint one of their panel of solicitors within their vast team of lawyers and what may appear to be unlimited resource.
This area of the law is governed by a special protocol which requires many steps to be taken before court proceedings can be commenced. The protocol’s aim is to get both sides of the dispute to set out their respective position with some clarity and supported (if appropriate) by expert evidence. The parties are then encouraged to resolve the matter without troubling the Court. In practice (and we accept some may think as cynical) insurance companies often like to use the Protocol to delay matters for as long as possible.
The Court’s attitude to professional negligence claims can vary depending upon financial and social market conditions. For example, in a surveyor’s valuation negligence claims, the Court has repeatedly rejected any attempt to claim against the drop-in value of a property interest due to a fall in the property market, even though the negligent valuation took place in a different market and the purchaser has missed out.
The first point to consider in a potential claim against a professional is to establish the precise ambit of the professional’s retainer. For example, if legal advice is sought on a transaction, a lawyer may try to exclude the tax ramifications of the transaction. However in 2017 the Court of Appeal decided that a solicitor has a duty to notify his client that whilst he took one view as to the validity of the tax scheme, it was possible that the Revenue might take a different view and a failure to so explain was negligent. In reality the Court will expect a client to be told of the risks in the transactions and the options open to him so the client can form a view and whether to take the risk.
It is to be noted that the fact that something goes wrong does not mean the professional is automatically liable. The test is what a competent professional would have done in the circumstances of the case and that can require expert evidence to be produced.
There are lawyers who are not happy to sue other lawyers but at GSC we don’t have such qualms. If we consider another professional has not given advice to a competent standard we will advise our clients pursue a claim. We have found that in most cases the insurance company will eventually make an offer provided sufficient pressure is brought upon them or they are faced by trial unless for the insurance company the case raises a matter of principle upon which it considers people would be helped by a Court judgement.
‘A small firm which punches well above its weight’ GSC Solicitors LLP undertook leasing transactions for several blue-chip corporate tenants, particularly in the media sector. It acted for a number of hotel owners regarding the acquisition and development of new hotels.
“We have found the service excellent, and it is for this reason we have continued to use GSC. The key strengths for us have been a commercial approach to deals that is often missing from solicitors, and a personal service based on a knowledge of us and our needs and long-term plans.”
“The main positive comparison we have noted from GSC is the personal touch and commercial acumen.”
“We have often used different legal firms for IP and other work in the past, but GSC’s commercial approach and professionalism, coupled with the excellent working relationship we have built up over a number of years makes it our preferred choice.”
“As a Financial Advisor I have been personally using and recommending GSC for over thirty years. I have referred clients of mine to them and only ever been thanked for the recommendation, which should convey the confidence I have in the individuals, and the firm.”
“Great result today. Just wanted to say thank you for your continued hard work in fighting our corner on this case. You have both been amazing. Michael incredible support and good ideas.”
Legal 500: 'GSC punches above its weight.’
Legal 500: ‘I have worked with GSC for many years and have been hugely impressed with their knowledge of the sector and the law.’
Legal 500: 'GSC are engaging and take time to not only understand the nature of your enquiry but the nature of your business itself. They are quick to grasp complexities and tailor advice and solutions that are very specific.’
Legal 500: 'Great understanding of tax matters and tactics, very professional. Very professional and methodical, confident way of handling case work’.
Legal 500: 'I had a fantastic experience working with the solicitors at GSC Solicitor LLP. Their team consists of highly skilled professionals who are committed to providing exceptional legal support. The staff was attentive, responsive, and demonstrated a deep understanding of my needs’.
Legal 500: 'Working with GSC has been a standout experience, thanks to their exceptional individuals. Their team possesses unique qualities that set them apart from competitors’.
Legal 500: 'What distinguishes GSC’s individuals is their commitment to client satisfaction. They understand my needs, communicate transparently, and work seamlessly as a team. Their professionalism, integrity, and personalised approach inspire trust and confidence’.
Legal 500: '100% commitment to the cause. Clients get an exceptionally-dedicated team.’
Legal 500: 'Service is phenomenal, advice is quick, and calls are always returned.’
Legal 500: ‘The practice is very hands-on and engaged with its clients.’
Legal 500: ‘Outstanding skills and a great ability to understand international legal issues.’
Legal 500: ‘Excellent service and especially professional.’
Legal 500: ‘The team have excellent knowledge in real estate and can advise on complex transactions.’
For every part of your life and business, talk to GSC
GSC Solicitors LLP
31-32 Ely Place, London EC1N 6TD
DX: 462 London/Chancery LN (View on map)